tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527573980897631948.post5423549051917826847..comments2023-06-14T12:59:52.209+01:00Comments on DominoYesMaybe: Google Trends - Lotus Domno v Microsoft Exchange some thoughtsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09211785785682223613noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527573980897631948.post-6204686715701629672008-04-29T19:48:00.000+01:002008-04-29T19:48:00.000+01:00@Ian Indeed you have :-) and alas it seems that yo...@Ian Indeed you have :-) and alas it seems that your words are falling on if not deaf, unreceptive ears.<BR/><BR/>@www True .. I added both Lotus Notes and in the interests of fairness Microsoft Outlook so both clients and servers were represented.And there is a nice big spike early in 2008.. which drops off in less than 6 weeks back to background noise. So not quite as bad as i thought.. but not sometime to write home about. I would love to see that spike up and maintaining a bit of height for longer than a few weeks. particularly since there is announcement after announcement comming from IBM central on all of the lotus product range.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09211785785682223613noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527573980897631948.post-9030576386888677902008-04-29T07:38:00.000+01:002008-04-29T07:38:00.000+01:00SteveIt might be worth it going to Google Trends a...Steve<BR/><BR/>It might be worth it going to Google Trends and search for Lotus Notes, Lotus Domino and Microsoft Exchange. This will give you a much better picture.<BR/><BR/>http://www.google.com/trends?q=Lotus+Notes%2C+Lotus+Domino%2C+Microsoft+Exchange&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10376844077034628103noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1527573980897631948.post-30397282466559534362008-04-28T23:17:00.000+01:002008-04-28T23:17:00.000+01:00I have been banging on about this for years and ye...I have been banging on about this for years and years<BR/><BR/>What you can only just see a hint off are the almost zero news stories in 2004, it is a shame that we cant go further back than that with the analysisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com